Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
6 Steps to Improving the Current Handicap System.

6 Steps to Improving the Current Handicap System.

6 Steps to Improving the Current Handicap System.

Golf Chats is a website to encourage discussions on various subjects relating to the game of golf. I am Mel Sole, Director of Instruction of the Mel Sole Golf School and SAPGA Master Professional.  I invite you to enter into a discussion on this or any article on the website.  The input is for the entire subscriber base to learn something new each time!  Please post your comments below.  Keep it clean and tasteful.  We are here to learn from one another!

This seems to be a subject that goes around and around with very little substance ever coming out of the USGA. (or the R&A for that matter)  Growing up in South Africa, we took a double bogey when we didn’t finish a hole.  Didn’t matter what the level of a golfer or the par of the hole.  Nice and simple.  You cannot try a build the handicap system around the cheater.  There will always be people who want to keep their handicaps higher for betting purposes.  No matter what the system, we will never get rid of these people.  I think world peace will happen sooner.  

So let’s move on, get an international system that everyone uses, and keep it simple!  

Thanks to  of Golf Digest for this useful information!

6 Steps to Improving the Current Handicap System.

The USGA Handicapping system is a marvel. It allows players of disparate skills to compete, and, if everyone is honest, to compete fairly. (Big “if,” we know.)

But the system produces painful side effects. Reinforcing the American obsession with stroke play, causing people to play for a medal score even when they’re playing matches. It discourages other, sometimes faster, formats by not counting those scores. Taken together, it contributes to slow play and frustration: If every player has to count every last stroke “for handicap purposes” even a match play round is a dreary marathon and the sport is far less fun than it might be.

So it was a huge disappointment when the USGA recently announced changes to the system (something it only does every four years or so) and did little to address these issues. The most talked-about and debated change—banning of unaccompanied rounds for handicaps—induced a yawn here. OK, so you don’t take my scores, which are perfectly accurate, because someone else is padding his. Does that really help? It’s re-painting the Titanic’s deck chairs—forget about rearranging them.

We hear the association is close to greater changes. We hope so. Here’s what it should look like:

1. Get with the rest of the world.

For years the USGA has discussed with the R&A and other golf associations the desirability of a common worldwide handicap system. Makes sense, since Americans more and more often play overseas and tons of overseas golfers visit our clubs and resorts. There have been dozens, if not hundreds, of meetings about this. It’s time to act.

2. Adopt the Net Double Bogey limit.

A stumbling block to such an agreement is the U.S. resistance to a simple, “maximum net double bogey” standard for recording scores (the USGA prefers a more complicated Equitable Stroke Control, which, which several experts on handicapping tell us, is no more accurate). No score beyond a net double bogey counts for handicap calculation. If you’re about to make a double, might as well pick it up. There’s no need to putt out your 9 “for my handicap.” Take a breather. Enjoy the outdoors. And keep the game moving. It’s a stance mathematician Dean Knuth, the architect of the Slope System, has long advocated. And he’s right.

3. Encourage Stableford scoring.

In Europe and Australia, this net-double-bogey limit includes the use of the Stableford points scoring: One point for net bogey, two points for par, three points for birdie, zero for anything higher than bogey. It’s enjoyable because it rewards good play without letting an abysmal hole destroy your round. The European Golf Association and Australia have built handicap systems based on Stableford points. If, for example, you average 20 points (out of a maximum 36) your handicap will be about 16. At the very least the USGA could encourage “points” play at its clubs. For kids, who play other sports for positive points, Stableford makes complete sense.

It is, Knuth says, “Fast and fun.” One expert on slow play agreed that it can help there, too. (For the record, we are not advocating the revised Stableford format used by the old International professional tournament. That penalized golfers for high scores; fine for pros, defeats the purpose for amateurs.) And if Stableford sounds stodgy, call it Points Scoring.

To see the other 3 steps to improving the current handicap system, go here!

Source: Golf Digest

Pictures: Golf DigestEric Havir

Thanks for reading – 6 Steps to Improving the Current Handicap System. 

Related Posts.

Are golfers finally improving – and if so, why?


Tags: , , , ,